Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tahith Chong

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 18:46, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tahith Chong[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This subject fails WP:NFOOTY as he has never played in a competitive, senior match for a professional club. He also fails WP:GNG, as all coverage of him seems to be little more than routine. – Pee Jay 08:37, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. – Pee Jay 08:39, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 08:42, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails NFOOTY as has not played or managed senior international football nor played or managed in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. Fenix down (talk) 14:34, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - He has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 12:40, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:NFOOTBALL having never played in a fully professional league or a senior international fixture and does not have enough significant coverage to meet WP:GNG. Kosack (talk) 07:13, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete existing coverage is not significant enough to meet the GNG Wolfson5 (talk) 09:27, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - although I would not be opposed to it being moved to draft space, classic WP:TOOSOON. Article can be recreated if and when subject meets requirements listed above. Inter&anthro (talk) 02:59, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.